Are movies recession-proof? At least one firm thinks so
There’s been a flurry of stories about how macroeconomic conditions are affecting the day-to-day activities of consumers. High gas prices prompt people to drive less or avoid longer vacations, while other pinches reduce consumer confidence or make people think twice before buying an unessential new outfit, car, or house. But one area of the economy may be avoiding the impact of a possible recession: the movies.

If true, this would not be without precedent. Attendance levels reached their peak during the Depression, driven by the allure of escapism and fewer entertainment alternatives. On Tuesday, analysts at Morgan Joseph argued that movie attendance and revenue were “bucking the trend,” showing themselves to be “somewhat recession resistant.”
The firm cited results from last weekend, which made 22% more than the equivalent week in 2007. Of course, this needs to be taken with an ocean’s worth of salt. The weekend saw the $62.5 million debut of Disney-Pixar’s “Wall-E” in first place and Universal’s “Wanted,” earning $51.1 million, in second place. Strong results to be sure, but in using comparisons, it’s as important to consider the previous year; The top two films a year ago were Disney-Pixar’s “Ratatouille” ($47 million) and Fox’s “Live Free or Die Hard” ($33.4 million).
This year’s Pixar release had an adorable love struck robot as its lead, who tested off the charts in audience response. Ratatouille starred a cartoon rat, not the most beloved animal to anchor a film. While “Live Free or Die Hard” was part of a well-known series, the previous entry was 12 years old, and there was no real desire for a continuation. “Wanted,” on the other hand, was a fresh franchise based on a popular comic book series. In short, it was the films themselves that drove the gross, not macroeconomic conditions.
Morgan Joseph noted that this past weekend represented the fifth consecutive period that beat its counterpart of 2007. True, but this doesn’t signify much. Memorial Day weekend was 14% below 2007 levels (it was the worst gross for the holiday in five years), and it was headlined by “Indiana Jones,” one of the most eagerly-anticipated films of this or any other year. Other weeks saw declines of as much as 28% from the prior year, hurt as unexpected flops (”Speed Racer,” “Prince Caspian“) failed to measure up to last year’s blockbusters (”Spider-Man 3,” “Shrek 3″ and “Pirates of the Caribbean 3″).
Currently, the year-to-date 2008 box office is 2.3% above the same point in 2007. But when higher ticket prices are factored in (which Morgan Joseph doesn’t do), the premium is much diminished, meaning attendance rates are steady with last year or down slightly. So while the firm argues that the year-to-date improvement “seems to be improving, despite apparently weakening economic conditions,” it’s not quite accurate and the two aren’t necessarily related.
The firm is right about one thing: most of 2007’s top movies had already came out by this time last year. This year still has “The Dark Knight” and the sixth “Harry Potter” film to look forward to. These could indeed put the current year safely over 2007 levels, but there have been so many ups and downs this year so far that it’s just too close and early to tell.







Markets-hub.com